Fotos De Raylene Gets

There are worse disasters

Yeah, I can not say that I have not noticed that there are natural disasters

far worse than my in-laws.

Japan has trembled, the reactors have spit out

radioactivity, a powerful tsunami wiped out

coasts and cities.

seems to me that the referendum of 1987 Italy has said no to nuclear power.

now "someone" would take place around 5-6 central Italy,

so ad libitum.

Considering that the Japanese people is a serious, very organized and not have

managed over time to cope with damage from the earthquake center

and considering that Italy is a bit of seismic activity, but above all we

rookies for the management of earthquakes, do not have experience in conducting

nuclear power plants, waste disposal and we are hardcore gangsters inside

the question arises.

Why does no one to oppose a fuck seriously?
PD, Left Ecology Freedom, IDV where are you? Lately I feel

shoot bullshit, mainly by people indifferent and very unprepared.

am always incredulos by misinformation and how so arrogance of people who do not understand a

Ceppa talk of nuclear power. X

The excuse is usually saving ... WELL, fattostá I lived 7 years in Germany

and light-water-electricity bill was identical to that of Rome with the same number of

m2.

But people really believe that can save on your bill?
REALLY??
But then I'm right ... people are stupid! : D
You must put in mind that the lobby does not give a fuck about Emeritus save us ...

justify the price of the bill with some tax.

If you do not believe me go to Germany and compared some bills, but do not speak random

if you do not know.

Maybe someone is hoping to be employed as a laborer in power because currently unemployed, to Homer Simpson?

D ' oh!

I'm not saying they understand more than others, but modestly, I can tell a lot.

I felt very angry to hear about Dr. V. and I wonder how, in his old age and conscious

dell'altisonanza of its name and its position is not

ashamed to say, as a thief so many bullshit .. MONEY, we are always there ... Oh well that has recently

those of other cancer ahahahaha but I will not dwell.

So, I spoke of the benefits of nuclear power a competent engineer (or doctor) but does not affect the above I'd understand.

Unfortunately instead are always crap shoot "subspecies" of humankind, most

compatible with the television landscape, cultural and current election.

I want instead to write in the words of Marianne, an engineer and it so happens that if

I also intend to earthquakes because its beautiful region was affected by the earthquake April 6, 2009.

careful analysis, accurate and professional.

Apart from any disagreement so that you may have marked my contempt for most of the Italian ruling class, I ask you to read carefully what I am going to return.

contradict the words of Marianne only if you really can not just hearsay ...

about such a sensitive issue professional experience and qualifications count.

Et voila:

Each project in the energy sector should be part of a proactive and viable energy policy - Political in the sense of "what we do in practice to produce the energy we need.
Italy has never had.
Something tried to knock it down with Beppe Grillo primary energy (remember?) they arrived on time even suggestions from industry experts.
So I would say that before a nuclear or biomass, of an expanse of solar panels, a forest of wind turbines of a dam or a Larderello, Italy would need a serious energy policy.

We are unique in the world to have given a strategic decision (nuclear or not) a referendum on an emotional wave. Referendum however now no longer valid.

In 2008 the head of government announced its intention to build 10 new reactors in Italy, with the aim of producing 25% of energy needs by 2030 (this told him, carry him as such).
There is no Italian company in the last 20 years has built or operated a nuclear power plant in operation , this means that to continue on this path that Italy needs to rely on any foreign partner. Exxx (omitted from Amber) has already benefited forming a partnership with the French Exx to draft feasibility studies for the construction of EPR reactors, reactors that the French experience
shown problems in their Finnish project: spiraling costs generated outside of any financial model approved prior to embark on the project, not alignment construction time than estimated, construction defects and questionable security systems. For this reason
have a nuclear power plant in France or Germany is NOT the same as having a house: we can not stop. We can cook but good design and manage nuclear power plants remains to be demonstrated.

on the score card. Meanwhile, a bit 'of what we send abroad we had a little' treats the French Axxx (omitted from Amber) (235t, cost 250 mln eur), a bit 'are reprocessed in the UK (those of Central America, 1400T). If I understand it from those operated by Axxx (omitted from Amber) in 2025 will return to Italy and need to find where to put them. With what we can do with Neapolitan rubbish I dare not imagine what will happen. We will also doc uranium olive oil over the mozzarella with dioxin.

to mention funding.
At present, no bank has shown interest in funding support to persons as Exxx, but also Exxx Axxx Exxx (omitted from Amber) .
Who knows, maybe it will be the Cassa that thanks to books and good postal savings will come forward in financing, leaving gaping global giants in banking liquidity crisis post LxxxBxxx (omitted from Amber) . The French bank
BxxxPxxx (omitted from Amber) which is the bank with the greatest exposure to the investment in nuclear power plants throughout the financial world, but Italy does not seem interested.

As for the "standard" or "criteria" with which to build power plants ... If you look at those
dell'Ixxx (omitted from Amber) , not that there are numbers of "certain".
those type of civil engineering: seismic zone A, the coefficient of acceleration 9g-> dimensions the beam or pillar in front of this horizontal load. And we're not even able to handle this simple process design-> implementation-> test-> control in buildings.
in nuclear power plants for "standard" security does not mean any of this. The "criteria" about what should be every country that has equipped itself with nuclear reactors: they speak of strong system of regulatory agencies, transparency in decision-making. We do not have them.
Should we create them, how would we pool of graduates to supply us? Maybe we can ask students to Verxxx (omitted from Amber) and those who have attended the seminars Texx (omitted from Amber) if we are to have their CV.

In light of the above, I do not want nuclear power at home.

Ode to Marianna .. I have omitted the names, you never know .. in the end we have to do with the mafia of the worst kind